On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 14:38 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> > Also, keep in mind that address 2 is _never_ used at all anyway > > > >> This is not correct we always use first 2 pointers. First for tx command > >> second for the actual packet. > > > > Ok so you use two. > > My only point is just to make sure that you understand that __never__ > is not correct Right, sorry, I really should have checked. > > Writing three words in total. I strongly suggest that > > you have WAY more trouble in iwlwifi than an imagined performance issue > > coming from a corrected and understandable struct layout. > > You are rally trying breaking into open doors Currently I'm more > concern with correctness then performance so I wanted to rise > hopefully all issues. > I'm testing your layout it's work so far in my home setup. I'm on > holidays till EOW so I will be able to give it some more stress in Lab > only next week. Sure, that's fine, I can't really see what can go wrong but testing is always good. It just seemed to me that for some reason you preferred keeping the pair-layout and complicating the code? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
