> > I'd argue for trying it though as it makes the code MUCH simpler. > > I totally agree that it will be simpler to do the work directly from > the cfg context rather than scheduling it. > On a cortex A5 MPU and SPI bus running on 48Mhz, this takes 20ms in > the idle case, and 100 to 300ms in case of data being transferred in > parallel. That does sound pretty slow ... but OTOH, mostly wpa_s etc. would expect this to actually complete before the next step, so if this is slow and wpa_s/hostapd is much faster, it might send you a lot of things to do and so you'd end up being slow anyway? johannes
