On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:14:19AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > 1. Every transmitter shall have ONE, and just ONE (not zero, not two, > not more) rfkill class attached. For those transmitters lacking support > in hardware to make it block, the drivers shall quiesce them and avoid > doing anything to cause transmissions, or even use bus tricks to power > the device down (i.e. the driver will emulate a switch capable of doing > the blocking). How do we enforce this? iwl4965 provides an rfkill device, but hp-wmi will also provide one for the wifi. If I swap out the wireless card for something else, I may lose the card-specific rfkill device. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
