On 21/01/14 17:18, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 17:09 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > >>> Actually this isn't expected throughput, but >>> wouldn't something like expected throughput make even more sense? >> >> How should I obtain that if not with the previous operation (bitrate*prob)? > > Minstrel actually has some tables for that, no? This would still just > only be the raw bitrate, not the actual throughput. I will check within Minstrel, but in this way we are limiting batman-adv to use only what Minstrel thinks to be the "expected throughput"....And if this turns to be something not adequate we will have to change API. -- Antonio Quartulli
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
