On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 17:09 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > Actually this isn't expected throughput, but > > wouldn't something like expected throughput make even more sense? > > How should I obtain that if not with the previous operation (bitrate*prob)? Minstrel actually has some tables for that, no? This would still just only be the raw bitrate, not the actual throughput. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
