On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 12:09 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> + * @prob: probability of success of this birate
typo: bitrate
> +struct cfg80211_minstrel_rate_info {
> + u32 bitrate;
> + u32 prob;
> +};
Do you actually care about this, rather than bitrate*prob, ie. something
like "expected throughput"? Actually this isn't expected throughput, but
wouldn't something like expected throughput make even more sense?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
