On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 19:01 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote:
>
> > + if (vif->csa_active) {
> > + vp->csa_bcn_cnt++;
>
> I don't see any readers of this variable?
>
> > + if (vp->csa_finished) {
> > + wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,"%s extra CSA-beacon\n", __func__);
> > + } else if (ieee80211_csa_is_complete(vif)) {
> > + wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,
> > + "%s CSA complete after %d beacons\n",
> > + __func__, vp->csa_bcn_cnt);
>
> except for the debug, but is that really useful?
>
In a sim/debug module ? I found it appropriate ;)
Seriously I have no strong opinion on this matter, as I said, feel free
to do whatever you want with this, there's nothing critical here.
> > + ieee80211_csa_finish(vif);
> > + vp->csa_finished = true;
>
> and if we remove the other debug we can also remove the csa_finished
> variable, that seems reasonable to me since mac80211 would already warn
> anyway, no?
>
I just got rid of a big blahblah I got for this, please, adjust as you
see fit as I have no strong opinion on this matter.
Karl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
