Search Linux Wireless

Re: SoftMAC vs FullMAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:07:29PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:

> If creating and uploading the keys to the device is less work than
> doing crypto in software, then it is clearly a win.

Not necessarily..

> And that _is_ the case for bcm43xx (at least. I don't know about other
> devices' hwcrypto capabilities).
> Doing less on the CPU and more in hw is always a win. I'm not sure
> how you can say that you're not sure it is. ;)

As an example, some of the earlier Prism2 designs supported WEP in
hardware/firmware. Yes, it would free up some host CPU, but the maximum
throughput dropped from ca. 6 Mbps to 4 Mbps (and much lower in some
cases).. WEP is quite fast operation, so using the host CPU to double
throughput sounds like a good trade in many cases.

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux