Search Linux Wireless

Re: SoftMAC vs FullMAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Has it been considered to simply treat all wireless hardware as
> SoftMAC and to just ignore the FullMAC capabilities?
[skip]
> Dscape looks to have already started down this path with
> implementations for five vendors. Is the plan to do this for all
> vendors, including Intel and Atheros?

It is the plan for Atheros.  See Dadwifi.

In fact, Atheros chips are not that intelligent to be treated as FullMAC, but
going to d80211 removes many chip specific features.

--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux