Search Linux Wireless

Re: SoftMAC vs FullMAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/07, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In fact, Atheros chips are not that intelligent to be treated as FullMAC, but
going to d80211 removes many chip specific features.

What types of features are removed? For example Atheros turbo mode can
be treated like another PHY layer implementation.

If it is just off-loading the implementation of standard behavior then
we may actually be better off ignoring this capability and
implementing the standard behavior in the host.

It's not even clear to me that doing encryption is a wireless
co-processor is a win. It is almost certain that the host can perform
the same algorithms many times faster that an embedded wireless
processor.  Moving encryption onto the host reduces the latency of the
connection.

--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux