Search Linux Wireless

Re: SoftMAC vs FullMAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:31:27PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:

> It's not even clear to me that doing encryption is a wireless
> co-processor is a win. It is almost certain that the host can perform
> the same algorithms many times faster that an embedded wireless
> processor.  Moving encryption onto the host reduces the latency of the
> connection.

Well, maybe in some use cases like a modern desktop/laptop CPU with
plenty of CPU power, but hardware acceleration for encryption is a huge
win on most embedded systems (e.g., APs). And like I mentioned, some
FullMAC designs do not even allow the encryption to be moved to the
host..
 
-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux