On 10/11/2023 21:18, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 08:58:57PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> I am repeating myself... but I don't know how to put it other way. I did >> not ask you to rewrite your driver. I asked to drop the change to >> bindings, because it is entirely pointless. >> >> Drop this change, only this. No need to rewrite drivers, they stay the same. > > Dropping this change (I'm assuming you are referring to the hunk adding > include/dt-bindings/reset/mt7988-resets.h) and also not adding that > header file using a seperate commit means that there won't be a header > defining the reset names. > > The result would be having to numerically reference the specific > resets in the device tree. Which is a problem because? Do you see bindings for IO space? For interrupts? For hundreds of other values? No, because the value is not a binding. DT binding binds the driver and DTS. If you have nothing in the driver, there is no binding. > > This is, of course, possible, but I don't understand what the advantage > would be. I pinged you three times on email I expect answer and there is nothing. You ignored the thread completely. I am finishing with this thread till you start answering emails. Best regards, Krzysztof
