On 21 June 2013 19:45, Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You were proposing to use a valid/existing MagicValue/Version/VendorID with a > special DeviceID that does nothing. I'm saying why not use a valid/existing > MagicValue/Version/VendorID/DeviceID with a special parameter setting, size=0, > that does nothing? Ah, I see. Well, it sounds from your quoted mount message as if they do actually do something (ie the kernel finds a block device and creates a /dev/vda for it), rather than nothing, which seems like a bad thing. Also, it's mixing a detail of the backend layer (what a zero-sized disk happens to look like) with the transport layer, which seems a bit ugly spec-wise. (Implementation wise I'm not crazy about it either since it would be way more complicated than saying "no backend? OK, RAZ/WI".) -- PMM _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
