Re: what should a virtio-mmio transport without a backend look like?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 June 2013 17:47, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:41 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> As it happens, if you use the command line to specify
>> a virtio device it doesn't make the same complaint about
>> bad magic number as if you specify it via dtb, but that
>> should probably be fixed in the kernel :-)
>
> I don't really see how this would be possible - the "complaining code"
> is just a normal platform device probe function.

Sorry, you're correct and I misremembered. I just retested
with specifying via command line and it behaves the same
way as via dtb.

-- PMM
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux