Hi Peter, On 06/21/2013 01:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 June 2013 17:47, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:41 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> As it happens, if you use the command line to specify >>> a virtio device it doesn't make the same complaint about >>> bad magic number as if you specify it via dtb, but that >>> should probably be fixed in the kernel :-) >> >> I don't really see how this would be possible - the "complaining code" >> is just a normal platform device probe function. > > Sorry, you're correct and I misremembered. I just retested > with specifying via command line and it behaves the same > way as via dtb. I was going to say something. I see that complaint all the time. Anyhow, I just did a quick experiment with 0-size block devices, and they seem to work for me, although trying to mount the device yields the confusing message, "mount: mounting /dev/vda on mount failed: Invalid argument". Regards, Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
