RE: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq at port removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Amit Shah [mailto:amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx] writes:
> On (Wed) 12 Dec 2012 [10:31:04], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed.
> Rproc_serial
> > >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave
> buffers in
> > >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-
> queue
> > >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume
> them
> > >> >> > yet.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland
> <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my
> > >> >> virtio-next branch now.
> > >> >
> > >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in
> > >> > virtio-next.  Did anything change in the meantime?
> > >>
> > >> Hmm:
> > >>
> > >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9?
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch.
> >
> > Still waiting for v9, AFIACT?
> 
> Instead of sending all patches marked v9, just this patch was
> re-spun.  I think you can just pick up patches 1 and 2 from v8 (they
> have my acked-by), and patch 3 was an earlier version of this one,

Yes, that's right. V8 contained three patches, Amit did a respin of 3/3 that was applied.
(And I mistakenly thought 1/3 and 2/3 was applied as well). 

Anyway I'm resending a new patch-set with the two missing patches.
The patches are identical to the V8, but are rebased to the virtio-next branch.

Sorry for the confusion here.

Regards,
Sjur

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux