On (Wed) 12 Dec 2012 [10:31:04], Rusty Russell wrote: > Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote: > >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > > >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial > >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in > >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue > >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them > >> >> > yet. > >> >> > > >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.] > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my > >> >> virtio-next branch now. > >> > > >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in > >> > virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime? > >> > >> Hmm: > >> > >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9? > > > > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch. > > Still waiting for v9, AFIACT? Instead of sending all patches marked v9, just this patch was re-spun. I think you can just pick up patches 1 and 2 from v8 (they have my acked-by), and patch 3 was an earlier version of this one, which should just be dropped. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
