Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote: >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them >> >> > yet. >> >> > >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.] >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my >> >> virtio-next branch now. >> > >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in >> > virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime? >> >> Hmm: >> >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9? > > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch. Still waiting for v9, AFIACT? Sjur, we're in the merge window now, so it'd be nice to get your latest version on top of linux-next (or simply my virtio-next git tree) today. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
