On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote: > Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial > >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in > >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue > >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them > >> > yet. > >> > > >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.] > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my > >> virtio-next branch now. > > > > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in > > virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime? > > Hmm: > > 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9? I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
