[PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:27:02 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak at suse.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:40:53PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Zachary Amsden (zach at vmware.com) wrote:
> > > I'm a little worried after seeing failures to apply and missed patches 
> > > that we could have other things missing from the upstream path.  Is 
> > > there an easy way for us to look at diffs between the trees?  Just a 
> > > diff on arch/i386 and include/asm-i386 would tell me wonders, no matter 
> > > how much extra activity has gone on there.
> > 
> > Last night I rebased against 2.6.15-mm2.  I'm adding four patches that
> > Andrew sent Andi last night.  I'll rediff and see what (if anything) is
> > outstanding.
> 
> I got Andrew's patches now but the result doesn't compile as earlier
> (on SUSE 10.0, gcc 4.0)
> 
> I'll adapt my old make-it-compile patch that fixed the inline assembly. 
> Hopefully it'll work then.
> 
> -Andi
> 
> /home/lsrc/quilt/linux/kernel/spinlock.c: In function '_spin_lock_irqsave':
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
> -letter
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:593: Error: undefined symbol `paravirt_ops' in operation
> {standard input}:593: Error: undefined symbol `PARAVIRT_irq_enable' in operation
> {standard input}:605: Error: undefined symbol `paravirt_ops' in operation
> {standard input}:605: Error: undefined symbol `PARAVIRT_irq_disable' in operatio
> n
> ICECREAM[14067]: Compiled on 10.23.204.76
> 

wtf?  How come patches leave here in working order and keep arriving broken?


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux