Chris Wright wrote: > * Andi Kleen (ak at muc.de) wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:54:55PM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: >> >>> Andi Kleen wrote: >>> >>>> no_timer_check. But it's only there on x86-64 in mainline - although there >>>> were some patches to add it to i386 too. >>>> >>>> >>> I can rename to match the x86-64 name. >>> >> I will do that in my tree. >> > > Looks like this one might have been lost. Here's the renamed version > (it's against 2.6.19-rc5-mm2, which should have your tree in it). > > thanks, > -chris > Thanks Chris, this is definitely a required patch for us. I'm a little worried after seeing failures to apply and missed patches that we could have other things missing from the upstream path. Is there an easy way for us to look at diffs between the trees? Just a diff on arch/i386 and include/asm-i386 would tell me wonders, no matter how much extra activity has gone on there. Namaste, Zach
