Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:09:22PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote: > >> Add a way to disable the timer IRQ routing check via a boot option. The >> VMI timer code uses this to avoid triggering the pester Mingo code, which >> probes for some very unusual and broken motherboard routings. It fires >> 100% of the time when using a paravirtual delay mechanism instead of >> using a realtime delay, since there is no elapsed real time, and the 4 timer >> IRQs have not yet been delivered. >> > > You mean paravirtualized udelay will not actually wait? > Yes, but even putting that problem aside, the timing element here is tricky to get right in a VM. > This implies that you can't ever use any real timer in that kind of guest, > right? > No. You can use a real timer just fine. But there is no reason ever to use udelay to busy wait for "hardware" in a virtual machine. Drivers which are used for real hardware may turn udelay back on selectively; but this is another patch. >> In addition, it is entirely possible, though improbable, that this bug >> could surface on real hardware which picks a particularly bad time to enter >> SMM mode, causing a long latency during one of the timer IRQs. >> > > We already have a no timer check option. But: > Really? I didn't see one that disabled the broken motherboard detection / workaround code, which is what we are trying to avoid here. >> While here, make check_timer be __init. >> > > So how is this supposed to work? The hypervisor would always pass that > option? If yes that would seem rather hackish to me. We should probably > instead probe in some way if we have the required timer hardware. > The paravirt kernel should know anyways it is paravirt and that it doesn't > need to probe for flakey hardware. > That is what this patch is building towards, but the boot option is "free", so why not? In the meantime, it helps non-paravirt kernels booted in a VM. Zach