On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:40:53PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Zachary Amsden (zach at vmware.com) wrote:
> > I'm a little worried after seeing failures to apply and missed patches
> > that we could have other things missing from the upstream path. Is
> > there an easy way for us to look at diffs between the trees? Just a
> > diff on arch/i386 and include/asm-i386 would tell me wonders, no matter
> > how much extra activity has gone on there.
>
> Last night I rebased against 2.6.15-mm2. I'm adding four patches that
> Andrew sent Andi last night. I'll rediff and see what (if anything) is
> outstanding.
I got Andrew's patches now but the result doesn't compile as earlier
(on SUSE 10.0, gcc 4.0)
I'll adapt my old make-it-compile patch that fixed the inline assembly.
Hopefully it'll work then.
-Andi
/home/lsrc/quilt/linux/kernel/spinlock.c: In function '_spin_lock_irqsave':
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
include2/asm/spinlock.h:59: error: invalid 'asm': operand number missing after %
-letter
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:593: Error: undefined symbol `paravirt_ops' in operation
{standard input}:593: Error: undefined symbol `PARAVIRT_irq_enable' in operation
{standard input}:605: Error: undefined symbol `paravirt_ops' in operation
{standard input}:605: Error: undefined symbol `PARAVIRT_irq_disable' in operatio
n
ICECREAM[14067]: Compiled on 10.23.204.76
