Re: "config x has an invalid interface number: y but max is z"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Stuge <peter@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>> > Is this useful to anyone?
>> 
>> In theory it would be useful to somebody developing firmware for a USB 
>> device.  If only such people would test their firmwares under Linux...
>
> Some do. Maybe it's only hobbyists, but I think it may change, 

The example I posted actually originates from a device with vendor
Linux support.  I am pretty sure that some firmware engineer there has
tested the device with Linux and ignored those warnings.

> and I
> think it's very good to warn about things which are wrong.

I agree in principle, as long as the warning is good for something.  In
this case it is not.  There is absolutely zilch you and I can do about
the issue, and it does not cause any problems we need to be aware of
either.

>> > Should we just drop those warnings?
>> 
>> No opinion.
>
> I think they should stay.

OK, but how about demoting them to debug messages instead of warnings?


Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux