Re: "config x has an invalid interface number: y but max is z"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Bjørn Mork wrote:

> Peter Stuge <peter@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Alan Stern wrote:
> >> > Is this useful to anyone?
> >> 
> >> In theory it would be useful to somebody developing firmware for a USB 
> >> device.  If only such people would test their firmwares under Linux...
> >
> > Some do. Maybe it's only hobbyists, but I think it may change, 
> 
> The example I posted actually originates from a device with vendor
> Linux support.  I am pretty sure that some firmware engineer there has
> tested the device with Linux and ignored those warnings.
> 
> > and I
> > think it's very good to warn about things which are wrong.
> 
> I agree in principle, as long as the warning is good for something.  In
> this case it is not.  There is absolutely zilch you and I can do about
> the issue, and it does not cause any problems we need to be aware of
> either.
> 
> >> > Should we just drop those warnings?
> >> 
> >> No opinion.
> >
> > I think they should stay.
> 
> OK, but how about demoting them to debug messages instead of warnings?

If you want to make that change, I don't mind.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux