On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:56:56PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/22/2012 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>But now that I've seen the transceiver driver it is probably the > >>smallest one. > > > >if it depends on the transceiver, why do we have i2c transfers on those > >drivers ? They should be hidden by the usb_phy_*() calls. > > Unless Roland has other plans now I would hide both (the gadget and > ohci) behind the PHY bar. correct. that isp1301.c is ridiculous. It's not using the (simple) phy layer we have now at all. It's also completely preventing multiple instances of this driver to be used. Quite silly implementation. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
