On 08/16/2012 11:31 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
USB_ISP1301 already depends on I2C. Maybe we should rather let USB_LPC32XX "depends on USB_ISP1301" instead of "select USB_ISP1301"?
And your OHCI select has the same problem. So we make both things depend on the transceiver instead of selecting it right? But now that I've seen the transceiver driver it is probably the smallest one. Further questions: - why is there "normal_i2c" ? - why is that thing not doing anything at all? Couldn't you just move the transiver logic out of the UDC? And fail in probe if it does not find one and get probed later again? I think we do something like that in the device case where the interrupt controller is not yet probed but the currently probed device requires it. Felipe, do we have a phy framework yet or is it still in work?
Thanks in advance, Roland
Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
