On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:11:53AM +0800, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote: > > > > > > > > It is the same with i.mx28. > > If they're same, imx23 should be ok. The mxs_phy driver pass test > > on mx28. > > > I think Richard's patch should not > > > violate point 2. Richard, can you confirm it? > > You mean I should not set the bit in mxs_phy_on_connect? > > or mxs_phy_on_connect is called in wrong place? > > > > HW_USBPHY_CTRL.ENHOSTDISCONDETECT should be set after bus reset is finished. So I guess you mean "mxs_phy_on_connect is called in wrong place". Then this patch is incorrect. > > > Thanks > > Richard > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Fabio Estevam > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
