Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:55 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 04:15 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>>>>>> This is like bypassing the otg_library to add or get the phy :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is, we don't have _the_ phy, we have one phy per usb port
>>>>>> and we have two USB ports.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think then this patch would solve your problem as it allows to add
>>>>> multiple-phys of the same type?
>>>>
>>>> We have two USB ports, a OTG capable and a host-only one. Each one has a
>>>> phy, which is used in the host mode and (if the USB port supports) in
>>>> the peripheral mode.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't follow you multi phy patches closely, what's the exact meaning
>>>> of type here. If this has already been discussed you can point me to the
>>>> appropriate thread.
>>>
>>> What we were doing in multi-phy patch is, whenever a phy driver
>>> registers itself in the otg library using usb_add_phy, it has to give
>>> a phy type along with it (USB2 PHY, USB3 PHY,..). We weren't allowing
>>> multiple phys of the same type, meaning in a system there cant be two
>>> users who calls usb_add_phy(USB2PHY) because there wasn't any
>>> reasonable way to get the phy.
>>> The complete discussion thread is @
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg63385.html
>>
>> Thanks, as Sascha pointed out, we have a strict phy<->usb relation, but
>> there are two phys and two usbs in our system. However a generic phy
>> layer would even be better.
>>
>>>>>>> Ideally you should make use of the otg library function for it. Having
>>>>>>> a generic function in the otg library to get phy by phandle will help
>>>>>>> other phy users to use it instead of implementing their own version of
>>>>>>> get_phy from phandle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code I pointed you at is the topmost patch in:
>>>>>> https://github.com/riczhao/kernel-imx/commits/topics/usb-driver
>>>>>> As soon as your code is available, let's convert it to use your generic
>>>>>> function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool. Thanks :-)
>>>>
>>>> I pointed you to the code to make sure it fits our use case. To be
>>>> precise, we have two of these usb to usbphy links in the dev-tree:
>>>
>>> yeah. So in the probe of your phy driver (fsl,imx28-usbphy), call
>>> usb_add_phy. Then you can call devm_get_phy_by_phandle in the usb
>>
>> But we have two USB2 phys in the system, will 2 usb_add_phy() work?

Ofcourse you'll need multi-phy support patches for it. Felipe has
already queued it in his tree.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git xceiv.

> Without this patch the phy types has to be different. If this patch
> gets merged that restriction is removed. (You can add 2 phys without
> any constraints).
>
> Thanks
> Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux