Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > @@ -997,7 +991,7 @@ static bool usbhsf_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param) > * > * usbhs doesn't recognize id = 0 as valid DMA > */ > - if (0 == slave->slave_id) > + if (0 == slave->simple_slave.slave_id) > return false; > > chan->private = slave; > @@ -1176,8 +1170,8 @@ int usbhs_fifo_probe(struct usbhs_priv *priv) > fifo->port = D0FIFO; > fifo->sel = D0FIFOSEL; > fifo->ctr = D0FIFOCTR; > - fifo->tx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id); > - fifo->rx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id); > + fifo->tx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id); > + fifo->rx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id); what are these "simple_slave" changes ? They have nothing to do with $SUBJECT ? In fact, breaks my gadget branch. How many times does a maintainer have to ask for contributors to keep changes atomic ? One patch == One single, self-contained, change. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
