On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > @@ -997,7 +991,7 @@ static bool usbhsf_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param) > > * > > * usbhs doesn't recognize id = 0 as valid DMA > > */ > > - if (0 == slave->slave_id) > > + if (0 == slave->simple_slave.slave_id) > > return false; > > > > chan->private = slave; > > @@ -1176,8 +1170,8 @@ int usbhs_fifo_probe(struct usbhs_priv *priv) > > fifo->port = D0FIFO; > > fifo->sel = D0FIFOSEL; > > fifo->ctr = D0FIFOCTR; > > - fifo->tx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id); > > - fifo->rx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id); > > + fifo->tx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id); > > + fifo->rx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id); > > what are these "simple_slave" changes ? They have nothing to do with > $SUBJECT ? In fact, breaks my gadget branch. Hrrrm... Right, sorry, that's clearly unrelated... Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
