Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Thomas Dahlmann wrote: > >>Soft reset on disconnect was needed for disconnects in the middle of > >>a transfer. Then controller buffers and registers may remain in a > >>kind of stuck state which can be resolved by a soft reset only. > > > >Nice. > > > >>I have to build up a system to play with the driver a little bit > >>(haven't done that for a while). > > > >Okay. I was going rid of the tasklet because it did not look perfomance > >critical or anything _and_ I was going to get rid of global variables. > >You mask interrupts before disconnect and then you enable them later after the > >reset. Do you think a workqueue would do the work? > > I'm not familiar with work queues. I have read that they allow to run > in process context and can sleep. But as they function as bottom > halfs too it should work. > > Is there any benefit from replacing the tasklet by a work queue? wouldn't threaded IRQs work ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
