On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Neil Zhang wrote: > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig > > > > @@ -194,6 +194,15 @@ config USB_EHCI_S5P > > > > help > > > > Enable support for the S5P SOC's on-chip EHCI controller. > > > > > > > > +config USB_EHCI_PXA > > > > + bool "EHCI support for PXA USB SPH and OTG controller" > > > > + depends on USB_EHCI_HCD > > > > + select USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT > > > > + ---help--- > > > > + Enables support for PXA USB SPH and OTG controller. SPH is a > > > > + single port host, and it can only be EHCI host. OTG is > > controller > > > > + that can switch to be host mode. > > > > + > > > > config USB_W90X900_EHCI > > > > bool "W90X900(W90P910) EHCI support" > > > > depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && ARCH_W90X900 > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci- > > hcd.c > > > > index 3ff9f82..4eb19f8 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c > > > > @@ -1329,6 +1329,11 @@ MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL"); > > > > #define PLATFORM_DRIVER ehci_xls_driver > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_EHCI_PXA > > > > +#include "ehci-mv.c" > > > > +#define PLATFORM_DRIVER mv_ehci_driver > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > If this is a PXA driver, why is it named "ehci-mv.c"? Why not > > "ehci-pxamv.c" or something like that? > > > > Also, I'm a little concerned by the fact that we already have > > CONFIG_USB_PXA168_EHCI and ehci-pxa168.c. Adding CONFIG_USB_EHCI_PXA > > could lead to a lot of confusion. > > > Actually, Marvell PXA and MMP serial all use the same USB IP and this driver is going to fit all of them. > So is it OK if I change CONFIG_USB_EHCI_PXA to CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MV and will add some more info in Kconfig. Yes, that will be okay. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html