On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Arvid Brodin wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> *snip*
> > The patch numbers he quotes (3-5 and 6) have to by decremented by two because
> > patch one has already been applied and patch two ("Clear TT buffer on
> > interrupted low & full speed transfers") has been objected by Alan and
> > he will rework it later.
> > The "known bug" he is talking about, is fixed by the last patch in this
> > series (has been posted in the middle of August to the list).
> >
>
> Please take all of the patches (including patch #2, "Clear TT buffer on
> interrupted low & full speed transfers"). Alan's objection was that part of my
> patch "fixed" code that could as well be removed, and I feel that removal of
> that code is better fixed by a separate patch. Removal of that code is not
> vital in any way, and the patch's other fixes does a lot of good by ensuring
> that low- and full-speed devices continue to work after an urb unlink.
>
> I'm not even sure that the rest of the patches will apply without patch #2.
>
> Sorry for the misunderstandings; I hope I'm clear enough this time. :)
Not really :(
I've applied these 5 patches, if there's anything else that I need to
apply, please resend it as I've now flushed my queue of isb1760 patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
