Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi Greg,
*snip*
> The patch numbers he quotes (3-5 and 6) have to by decremented by two because
> patch one has already been applied and patch two ("Clear TT buffer on
> interrupted low & full speed transfers") has been objected by Alan and
> he will rework it later.
> The "known bug" he is talking about, is fixed by the last patch in this
> series (has been posted in the middle of August to the list).
>
Please take all of the patches (including patch #2, "Clear TT buffer on
interrupted low & full speed transfers"). Alan's objection was that part of my
patch "fixed" code that could as well be removed, and I feel that removal of
that code is better fixed by a separate patch. Removal of that code is not
vital in any way, and the patch's other fixes does a lot of good by ensuring
that low- and full-speed devices continue to work after an urb unlink.
I'm not even sure that the rest of the patches will apply without patch #2.
Sorry for the misunderstandings; I hope I'm clear enough this time. :)
Thanks,
Arvid Brodin
Enea Services Stockholm AB
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
