Hi, On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:33:24PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Well, my final goal is to introduce the generic otg state machine, and > > the plan was to not allow the drivers to even see the state. I would > > prefer to keep it in otg. I think the UDC drivers except musb do not > > care about the state, and musb has basically the otg support embedded > > in the driver. What do you think? > > Like I said, the state is not OTG-specific. And knowing the state we > are, might be interesting at least for debugging, but also we might need > to know which state the transceiver is to take certain decisions. Very well. I'll keep it in transceiver. I'll make the v3 of these and change it. I'll also change the name from usb_transceiver to usb_phy. Thanks, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
