Hi, On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:52:47AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/9/11, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >>> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> > > Hi, > >>> > > > >>> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality. > >>> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code. > >>> > > > >>> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on > >>> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches > >>> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by: > >>> > > > >>> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > >>> > > >>> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer > >>> > instead. > >>> > >>> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c > >> > >> All 15 patches? No they don't they touch all sorts of things. > >> > >>> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ? > >> > >> Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right? > > > > Colleagues, can you please tell me the current status/future of this patches? > > Are they going to 3.1? 3.2? Should they go via ARM/PXA, via usb? usb-gadget? > > Via gpio(why?)?? Should I send them to somebody for merging? > > Well, I agree with Dmitry the whole patchset is not related to the GPIO > subsystem at all. The major cleanup is actually to the PXA machines, > and touches part of the pxa25x_udc driver. If some one Acks the USB > part, I can help take the remaining patches. For the gadget part you can have my Ack. Although I don't have how to test those patches, they seem simple enough: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature