On 7/9/11, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> > > wrote: >> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality. >> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code. >> > > >> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on >> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches >> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by: >> > > >> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >> > >> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer >> > instead. >> >> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c > > All 15 patches? No they don't they touch all sorts of things. > >> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ? > > Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right? Colleagues, can you please tell me the current status/future of this patches? Are they going to 3.1? 3.2? Should they go via ARM/PXA, via usb? usb-gadget? Via gpio(why?)?? Should I send them to somebody for merging? Thank you! -- With best wishes Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
