On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/9/11, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >>> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality. >>> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code. >>> > > >>> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on >>> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches >>> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by: >>> > > >>> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >>> > >>> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer >>> > instead. >>> >>> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c >> >> All 15 patches? No they don't they touch all sorts of things. >> >>> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ? >> >> Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right? > > Colleagues, can you please tell me the current status/future of this patches? > Are they going to 3.1? 3.2? Should they go via ARM/PXA, via usb? usb-gadget? > Via gpio(why?)?? Should I send them to somebody for merging? Well, I agree with Dmitry the whole patchset is not related to the GPIO subsystem at all. The major cleanup is actually to the PXA machines, and touches part of the pxa25x_udc driver. If some one Acks the USB part, I can help take the remaining patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
