On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 05:03:02PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > on 9g20 they are the same as the 9260 > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Resent upon Greg's request. > Based on current linux-next. > Applies cleanly on current linus' tree (2.6.39-rc7+) > > BTW, can we imagine it going to mainline before .39-final in a "fixes" pull > request to Linus from a at91 tree? No, as I don't think this is a bug-fix-only-for-regression, is it? It looks to be a "fix for new hardware" type thing, right? And is this really the correct way to do this for the .40 kernel, which is where I would be queueing this up for? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
