on 9g20 they are the same as the 9260
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Resent upon Greg's request.
Based on current linux-next.
Applies cleanly on current linus' tree (2.6.39-rc7+)
BTW, can we imagine it going to mainline before .39-final in a "fixes" pull
request to Linus from a at91 tree?
drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
index 9b7cdb1..41dc093 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */
- if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) {
+ if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) {
udc->ep[0].maxpacket = 64;
udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64;
udc->ep[4].maxpacket = 512;
--
1.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
