Re: MUSB Reorganization does not like modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:40:07PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 07:12, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Felipe Balbi (30):
> >  usb: musb: split omap2430 to its own platform_driver
> >  usb: musb: split am35x to its own platform_driver
> >  usb: musb: split tusb6010 to its own platform_driver
> >  usb: musb: split davinci to its own platform_driver
> >  usb: musb: split da8xx to its own platform_driver
> >  usb: musb: split blackfin to its own platform_driver
> 
> hmm, this doesnt seem to play well when building musb as a module
> 
> drivers/usb/musb/Makefile:
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC) += musb_hdrc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_BLACKFIN)         += blackfin.o
> 
> drivers/Makefile: (unrelated, but shouldnt this line be in
> drivers/usb/Makefile?)
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC) += usb/musb/

You're correct. But we can't build as module now because of the
debugging support we have on MUSB. That DBG() thingy is nice but to get
it working we would have to re-factor the entire debugging on MUSB.

That's why I recently (yesterday) sent a patch making MUSB bool until we
get that sorted out on next merge window.

-- 
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux