Hi, On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:09:18PM -0600, Greg KH wrote:
Hmm, but if you're sending patches for linux-next (i.e. not for the current rc), then don't you want to base off of Greg's usb-next tree?
what's the difference ? Git will figure all of that out anyway and Linus' will always be a "more stable" tree. We had the same in linux-omap tree and we came down to the conclusion that it's better to always base off Linus' tree unless we have dependencies on other patches which aren't in linux-2.6.git yet, but at that point we can always: $ git rebase --onto linus/master old-head current-branch and everything is all good.
Yes, please do that, otherwise I'll get extra merges that I do not need, and Linus does not want. I'll merge to Linus's tree ever -rc or so, only if needed for the -next branches.
will you ? Won't usb-next always be: most recent Linus + new features from Greg ? anyways, if you want that way, it's not a problem for me :-) -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
