On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:53 AM, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > This mimics the behaviour of drivers such as usbnet > > No need to single out usbnet by describing any > of what it does. It's not the only driver which > insists only that its buffers be valid, rather than > trying (or happening) to align them. > I'm not implying that usbnet does anything wrong, merely pointing out a real world case where the problem that the new tests check for can occur. > I don't actually see a patch I could ACK or NAK; > got URL? First message in this thread : http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128318949614553 Regards, Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
