On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:21:13PM +0530, Amit Nagal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:52 PM, sandeep kamboj > <sandeepkamboj2181@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > We are getting issue regarding File System usage via Libusb1.0 > > Libusb uses either usbfs and sysfs to scan a device. > > Mentioned below are my queries: > > 1. Which one i have to prefer i.e. usbfs or sysfs > > 2. Why usbfs is required as most of the information is provided by sysfs? > > 3. Does usbfs internally uses sysfs? > > 4. Is there any timing issues using sysfs? > > > > > > Please reply ASAP > > > > 5) Is it possible to do I/O with a usb device endpoints using sysfs ? Depends on the i/o you want to do :) > 6) Upon a usb device plugin , which filesystem (usbfs or sysfs ) > provides the device information faster ? What is "faster"? What "device information" do you want to get? And why are you asking this type of thing on the libusb mailing list and not the linux-usb mailing list? It has nothing to do with libusb that I can tell... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
