Re: Libusb: Usbfs vs Sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:52 PM, sandeep kamboj
<sandeepkamboj2181@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> We are getting issue regarding File System usage via Libusb1.0
> Libusb uses either usbfs and sysfs to scan a device.
> Mentioned below are my queries:
> 1. Which one i have to prefer i.e. usbfs or sysfs
> 2. Why usbfs is required as most of the information is provided by sysfs?
> 3. Does usbfs internally uses sysfs?
> 4. Is there any timing issues using sysfs?
>
>
> Please reply ASAP
>

5) Is it possible to do I/O with a usb device endpoints using sysfs ?
6) Upon a usb device plugin , which filesystem (usbfs or sysfs )
provides  the device information faster ?


Regards
Amit Nagal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux