Hi, On 9/13/21 1:06 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On 13.09.21 09:38, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have just updated my backups with f+k quirks enabled and everything worked without errors. Given that nobody appears to be aware of a sure test case for checking whether f alone is sufficient, should I just generate a patch enabling fk instead of u? >> Yes I believe that switching from fk to u, like done on the other Lacie entries is best. > > Hi, > > just to be sure that we are really on the same page. > > Do you really want to go to u - US_FL_IGNORE_UAS? The other one > has fk - US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES | US_FL_NO_SAME We currently have u - US_FL_IGNORE_UAS, because Julian's initial patch did that and that was merged. What we are talking about now, is moving from the big-hammer 'u' to fk - US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES | US_FL_NO_SAME, since testing has show that just 'fk' is enough, allowing us to keep using uas. > I may be a bit confused and I think we need to make sure first, that we are > talking about the same things. I hope that my reply above helps to clear things up. Regards, Hans
