On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 22:05, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That's why I asked, in case we are free to define a name, we might >> want to give it a unique one right away, but I expect the symlinks >> have been there for a reason. > > They were there because I didn't want to drop them if some userspace > tool was depending on them. > > I don't think that's the case anymore, so we can drop them now. Oh, the links are already dropped and the patch renames the devices to the names of the symlink. But if we are free to rename them, it might be good to prepend them with the interface name, so they are uniquely named on the bus, and can get added to the bus at any time somebody might need them. Not sure, if that is something we care about now? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
