On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:32, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:13:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> Hmm, maybe. I find kernel.org a bit more convenient, sf is still so >> slow sometimes. Where it lives, with git, it would not really matter, >> right? You should be able to just push to sf too, right? > > Well, sf.net wants a "site wide" git tree, like the cvs tree, so that > will not really work out as the cvs tree has lots of sub-projects at > this time. > > So let's just stick with kernel.org and github for now. Sounds good. >> > Oh, I think we should do a release, as the ids file is updated with a >> > lot of changes, want me to? >> >> Yeah, sounds fine. Or maybe wait until we dropped the dependency on >> /proc? It still says: >> ./lsusb -t >> cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices, No such file or directory (2) >> >> Also it should be ported to the new libusb, the old one is no longer >> supported, and has only a wrapper interface to the new lib. >> >> And people requested in the sf tracker that the binary should be in >> /usr/bin and not in /usr/sbin. > > Oops, I just did a release :) Hehe. :) > I'll work on the things you mentioned above tomorrow. I just looked at the new libusb and it seems it already parses the "descriptors" file. If that works out, and is useful, the first thing would be to convert to the new lib, I guess, and start from there. Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
