On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:13:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nice, I've pulled in all of your changes and pushed them back out. > > Nice. Thanks. > > > I wonder if I should use git at sf.net for this, or just leave things > > where they are for now. > > Hmm, maybe. I find kernel.org a bit more convenient, sf is still so > slow sometimes. Where it lives, with git, it would not really matter, > right? You should be able to just push to sf too, right? Well, sf.net wants a "site wide" git tree, like the cvs tree, so that will not really work out as the cvs tree has lots of sub-projects at this time. So let's just stick with kernel.org and github for now. > > Oh, I think we should do a release, as the ids file is updated with a > > lot of changes, want me to? > > Yeah, sounds fine. Or maybe wait until we dropped the dependency on > /proc? It still says: > ./lsusb -t > cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices, No such file or directory (2) > > Also it should be ported to the new libusb, the old one is no longer > supported, and has only a wrapper interface to the new lib. > > And people requested in the sf tracker that the binary should be in > /usr/bin and not in /usr/sbin. Oops, I just did a release :) Bah, I hate sf.net's release interface, but oh well, it's out there. I'll work on the things you mentioned above tomorrow. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
